Overall the APUs are a resounding success for AMD, offering decent performance outside of games compared to comparative Ryzen and Intel CPUs, while offering low budget gamers a cost-saving way to own a gaming PC. Even with a GTX 1080, the performance drop going from 16x to 8x is less than 1% in a majority of games. There is the small issue of both APUs being limited to eight lanes when it comes to PCI-E graphics cards, but you'd have to be considering a high-end GPU before this even remotely becomes an issue. The stock cooler coped fine too, even when they were overclocked, so there's little need to opt for a third party cooler either and, of course, as most AM4 motherboards include a PCI-E slot, you can drop in a discrete card at a later date. They obviously don't have the grunt to deal with modern games at maximum settings at 1080p and above, but they stand up well to typical $50-100 discrete graphics cards meaning that's money you can save or put towards something else. If you have a budget of around $500 for a PC, then AMD's new APUs should be top of your list of options when it comes to CPUs and graphics cards. This bodes well for Ryzen's second-generation CPUs due out soon.ĪMD Ryzen with Radeon Vega graphics Antony Leather Thanks to improvements from Precision Boost 2, this score also matches the Ryzen 5 1500X despite having a quarter of the 元 cache. That performance is pretty evident too - the Core i3-8100 scored 599 in Cinebench R15 while the Ryzen 5 2400G reached 823. There doesn't seem to be a way to beat AMD here either - even if you opt for a much cheaper CPU such as a Ryor Core i3-8100, you're still looking at spending between $30-$50 more overall and as the Ryzen 5 2400G also includes double the threads of either of those CPUs, you'll be losing out on multi-threaded performance as well as spending more. Once I'd overclocked the CPU and GPU portions of the Ryzen 5 2400G (the CPU to an all-core overclock of 3.85GHz and GPU to 1,300MHz), this saw it nearly match the GTX 1030 system in Deus Ex, and come within spitting distance in Unigine Superposition too, although admittedly Fallout 4 didn't see much improvement. I should also add that I increased the onboard memory limit for the Vega GPU to the maximum allowed 2GB in all tests.ĪMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G Antony Leather To test the Nvidia GTX 1030, I simply disabled the onboard Vega graphics and used a PCI-E EVGA GTX 1030 2GB. I used an Intel stock cooler and Gigabyte Z370N-WiFi motherboard with the same memory and PSU and a Samsung 960 Pro M.2 SSD was used in all test systems. I also used MSI's B350I Pro AC motherboard, a Corsair AX860i PSU and Corsair 16GB 3,000MHz Vengeance LPX memory. I used AMD's Ryzen Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics press kit, which included a Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G plus the Wraith cooler, which will be included with retail CPUs too. Intel's Core i3 8100 sits in around the $120 mark, but as most of us know, even though it does sport onboard graphics, it's nowhere near enough to handle modern 3D gaming, even at low settings. That's pretty interesting when you consider you're getting a capable graphics processor too, especially as something equivalent will, as I've mentioned, set you back a further $50-100. Not only do they offer similar pixel-pushing grunt to your typical $50-$100 discrete GPU, but they cost about the same as AMD's GPU-less options, namely the Ryand 1500X. This is where the $169 Ryzen 5 2400G and $99 Ryzen 3 2200G come in. However, the new APUs sport AMD's improved boosting technology - Precision Boost 2, which promises to increase performance particularly in lightly-threaded workloads. Two notable limitations of the new APUs compared to their older Ryzen counterparts are the number of PCI-E lanes available for the GPU - just eight compared to the usual 16, plus the 元 cache is half that of the Ryat just 4MB. However, you can probably expect the Ryzen 5 2400G to offer the $100 RX 550 some competition in most games, with its onboard GPU sporting three extra CUs and a faster GPU core frequency. The clock speeds are similar, but the RX 560 has a clear lead in compute units. The above table includes details not just for the R圜PU, but also for the RX 560 and RX 550 graphics cards so you can compare their specifications to those of the new APU's Vega-based graphics processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |